ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD
Minutes
12th July 2022
1. Welcome and introductions
Attendees:
PFCC Stephen Mold (SM)
Paul Fell (PF)
Nicci Marzec (NM)
Louise Sheridan (LS)
CC Nick Adderley (NA)
DCC Simon Blatchly (SB)
Colleen Rattigan (CR)
D/Chief Supt Paul Rymarz (RP)
D Supt Joe Banfield (JB)
Vaughan Ashcroft (VA)
2. Previous minutes and action log
3. Strategic outcomes requirements update
The Chief Constable, as a part of the budget setting process for 2022/23, agreed a set of strategic outcome requirements with the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner. These were set out and agreed in a letter.
The Commissioner requires a report which outlines the progress made against the achievement of these to the end of June 2022.
Action – NA to task ACC Ash Tuckley Ash to scope out an Interoperability business continuity plan.
Action – NA to provide a breakdown on the make-up of the 14% Positive Outcome rate by charge/summons, OOCD etc.
Action – PR to send the Commissioner a copy of the Digital Forensics Digital Policy and SLA.
Action – DCC Blatchly to provide the Commissioner with MOSOVO visit data.
Assurance statement:
The Commissioner received a paper in which the Chief Constable updated on progress so far relating to this year’s Strategic requirements, as a part of the budget setting process. There was discussion on several points, notably response times, positive outcome rates, quality of service and digital forensics.
The Commissioner made the point that he was pleased with the measures and KPI that the Chief Constable had adopted for judging activity and success against his measures of success. He made the point that his office had queried some of the actual baselines and metrics as they were open to interpretation and wanted complete clarity and we awaited a response from the Chief Constable on those but agreed with the broad thrust of them.
The Commissioner stated that where the Force had requested additional investment in places like vetting and DFU that vetting, and recruitment was being prioritised as some of these vacancies still existed
The Commissioner was assured that there was progress being made in most areas, for this early stage of the year. He again reinforced his expectation that both the Chief Constable and Chief Fire Officer would ensure there was pace in the operational interoperability work.
4. HMICFRS update
At the February 2022 accountability board, the Chief Constable provided an update paper relating to the 2021 HMICFRS PEEL inspection report.
The request for this report read:
“Following the 2021 PEEL inspection and report the Commissioner requires a paper which outlines how the Force intends to address and deliver progress against the AFI and key findings highlighted in the inspection report along with key timescales”
At that meeting it was agreed that there would be quarterly follow up reports. The Commissioner therefore requires a paper for this meeting with an update since this time.
Assurance Statement:
The Commissioner was assured that the Chief Constable had robust oversight and governance processes in place to deliver against the PEEL inspection AFI’s. He reinforced the point that activity still needed to be delivered but was assured with the Chief Constable comments that all were on track to meet his expectations and will have been actioned by the end of Q3 2022.
The Commissioner requested clarity from the Chief Constable about his comments in the report on the Force being graded as good. The Chief Constable confirmed that it was his intention that the Force would be graded as good in all areas at the next PEEL inspection.
The Commissioner stated he would require a further report in 3 months’ time.
5. Violence Against Women and Girls report
In March 2022 the Chief Constable provided the PFCC with a report outlining progress against the September 2021 HMICFRS report “Police response to violence against women and girls” and a progress update in relation to the Force Strategy and delivery plan for VAWG.
At that meeting it was agreed that this would be subject to a further paper in a quarter.
As such, the Commissioner requires a report that outlines the progress made on both since this time, and that identifies gaps in provision or risks and issues.
Op Kayak
Solar Teams
Tailored and consistent support to victims
Protecting Vulnerable People Department (PVP)
Review of outcomes 15 and 16 in VAWG offences.
In May, the Force Senior Officer Reviews have specifically focussed on Outcome 15 DA offences.
Action – JB to send a supplementary report to the Commissioner regarding the use of outcomes 15 and 16 in VAWG offences and add this information to future reports.
Assurance Statement:
The Commissioner was assured that progress had been made across a number of areas of this important agenda. He welcomed the fact that the Force were cognisant that policing the night-time economy and the risks posed to women was as much a cultural matter as a policing matter and that there will be additional training to support that.
He welcomed the progress made against the 5 recommendations in the HMICFRS report but stated that he would have expected more detail in the paper on the work against the internal plan
6. A.O.B